[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091222072213.GY4490@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:22:13 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] AlacrityVM guest drivers for 2.6.33
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:44:17PM -0500, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > They should be relatively rare
> > because obtaining good receive batching is pretty easy.
>
> Batching is poor mans throughput (its easy when you dont care about
> latency), so we generally avoid as much as possible.
>
> > Considering
> > these are lightweight exits (on the order of 1-2us),
>
> APIC EOIs on x86 are MMIO based, so they are generally much heavier than
> that. I measure at least 4-5us just for the MMIO exit on my Woodcrest,
> never mind executing the locking/apic-emulation code.
>
With x2apic EOIs are not MMIO any longer.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists