| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091223090411.GA8526@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:04:11 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI and driver patches for 2.6.33.merge
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:57:19AM +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:09:04AM +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>> Shaohua Li wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:08:57PM +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>>>>> * Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:28:50AM +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Linus,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> please pull from:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ;..
> >>>>>>>>> Shaohua Li (3):
> >>>>>>>>> ? ? ?ACPI: Add a generic API for _OSC -v2
> >>>>>>>>> ? ? ?ACPI: cleanup pci_root _OSC code.
> >>>>>>>>> ? ? ?ACPI: Add platform-wide _OSC support.
> >>>>>>>> it seems these three patches broke the _OSC on my intel new systems.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> revert them fix the problem with AER and pciehp and etc
> >>>>>>> can you give more details? I just cleaned up the _OSC code for AER and
> >>>>>>> pciehp, no function changes.
> >>>>>> Famous last words ;-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yinghai, i suspect Shaohua needs the kind of info you'd need if you tried to
> >>>>>> fix it: acpidump, before/after debug boot log, a description of what goes bad,
> >>>>>> etc.
> >>>>> the so called clean up, change the ret length checking.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - if (!output.length)
> >>>>> - return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
> >>>>> -
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + /* return buffer should have the same length as cap buffer */
> >>>>> + if (context->ret.length != context->cap.length)
> >>>>> + return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
> >>>> Wield BIOS. ACPI spec does mention the return buffer have the same length.
> >>>> Does changing the check back make the issue go away?
> >>> change to
> >>> if (context->ret.length < context->cap.length)
> >>>
> >>> make AER work, but pciehp still fail.
> > Can you try below patch please? Looks the returned acpi buffer is a two-tiled buffer.
> > Strange is it doesn't fail at my hand.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > index 65f7e33..0c1ad31 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > @@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
> > union acpi_object *out_obj;
> > u8 uuid[16];
> > u32 errors;
> > + struct acpi_buffer output = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
> >
> > if (!context)
> > return AE_ERROR;
> > @@ -419,16 +420,16 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
> > in_params[3].buffer.length = context->cap.length;
> > in_params[3].buffer.pointer = context->cap.pointer;
> >
> > - status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, &context->ret);
> > + status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, &output);
> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > return status;
> >
> > - /* return buffer should have the same length as cap buffer */
> > - if (context->ret.length != context->cap.length)
> > + if (!output.length)
> > return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
> >
> > - out_obj = context->ret.pointer;
> > - if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> > + out_obj = output.pointer;
> > + if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER
> > + || out_obj->buffer.length != context->cap.length) {
> > acpi_print_osc_error(handle, context,
> > "_OSC evaluation returned wrong type");
> > status = AE_TYPE;
> > @@ -457,11 +458,20 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
> > goto out_kfree;
> > }
> > out_success:
> > - return AE_OK;
> > + context->ret.length = out_obj->buffer.length;
> > + context->ret.pointer = kmalloc(context->ret.length, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!context->ret.pointer) {
> > + status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
> > + goto out_kfree;
> > + }
> > + memcpy(context->ret.pointer, out_obj->buffer.pointer,
> > + context->ret.length);
> > + status = AE_OK;
> >
> > out_kfree:
> > - kfree(context->ret.pointer);
> > - context->ret.pointer = NULL;
> > + kfree(output.pointer);
> > + if (status != AE_OK)
> > + context->ret.pointer = NULL;
> > return status;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_run_osc);
>
> aer and pciehp work again with this patch.
Len, this is the patch with describtion, please check and apply.
Executing _OSC returns a buffer, which has an acpi object in it.
Don't directly returns the buffer, instead, we return the acpi object's
buffer. This fixes a regression since caller of acpi_run_osc expects
an acpi object's buffer returned.
Tested-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
index 65f7e33..0c1ad31 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
union acpi_object *out_obj;
u8 uuid[16];
u32 errors;
+ struct acpi_buffer output = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
if (!context)
return AE_ERROR;
@@ -419,16 +420,16 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
in_params[3].buffer.length = context->cap.length;
in_params[3].buffer.pointer = context->cap.pointer;
- status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, &context->ret);
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, &output);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return status;
- /* return buffer should have the same length as cap buffer */
- if (context->ret.length != context->cap.length)
+ if (!output.length)
return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
- out_obj = context->ret.pointer;
- if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
+ out_obj = output.pointer;
+ if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER
+ || out_obj->buffer.length != context->cap.length) {
acpi_print_osc_error(handle, context,
"_OSC evaluation returned wrong type");
status = AE_TYPE;
@@ -457,11 +458,20 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context)
goto out_kfree;
}
out_success:
- return AE_OK;
+ context->ret.length = out_obj->buffer.length;
+ context->ret.pointer = kmalloc(context->ret.length, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!context->ret.pointer) {
+ status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
+ goto out_kfree;
+ }
+ memcpy(context->ret.pointer, out_obj->buffer.pointer,
+ context->ret.length);
+ status = AE_OK;
out_kfree:
- kfree(context->ret.pointer);
- context->ret.pointer = NULL;
+ kfree(output.pointer);
+ if (status != AE_OK)
+ context->ret.pointer = NULL;
return status;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_run_osc);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists