linux-kernel - Re: [fuse-devel] utimensat fails to update ctime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B322924.1030406@wanadoo.fr>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:28:52 +0100
From:	Jean-Pierre André <jean-pierre.andre@...adoo.fr>
To:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
CC:	Eric Blake <ebb9@....net>, fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] utimensat fails to update ctime

Hi,

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> I suggest I port Miklos patch to fuse-lite soon,
>> and delay the low-level case (and microsecond
>> precision) until January. Does that suit your needs ?
>>      
> Thanks. Sounds good. I'm not using ntfs-3g actually, I just bridged the
> bug report on lkml to others. Eric?

As my Christmas present to any real non-bridging
user, here is, ahead of schedule, the patch for the
low level fuse interface of ntfs-3g.

The good news is that for this interface, no update
of fuse is needed. So there is no compilation issue with
unpatched versions of fuse, and the attached patch
is independent of the one for the high-level interface
posted previously, except for the configuration.ac file
for which I duplicate the patch.

Regards

Jean-Pierre

View attachment "lowutimensat.patch" of type "text/plain" (5839 bytes)