linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] of: make set_node_proc_entry private to proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:48:23 -0700
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
Cc:	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] of: make set_node_proc_entry private to 
	proc_devtree.c

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com> wrote:
> We only need set_node_proc_entry in proc_devtree.c, so move it there.
>
> This fixes the !HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS build, as we can't make make
> the definition in linux/of.h conditional on this #define (definitions in
> asm/prom.h can't be exposed to linux/of.h, due to the enforced #include
> ordering).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>

A little ugly, but it can probably be refactored and cleaned up later
(like a lot of other things in the merged code).  Otherwise these
three patches look good to me.  I've picked them up into my tree and
I'll push them out soon.

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/