[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B3171DF.4070903@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:26:55 -0800
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
CC: arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sam@...nborg.org,
dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BUG(): CONFIG_BUG=n version of BUG() should be unreachable()
Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> Previouss definition of BUG() as 'do {} while(0)' produced compilation
> warnings when BUG() was used in default branch of switch() statement
> (control reaches end of non-void function).
>
> Example:
> unsigned long function()
> {
> switch() {
> case 1:
> return 1;
> case 2:
> return 2;
> default:
> BUG();
> }
>
> Using unreachable() fixes the problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
>
NAK.
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> index 18c435d..1106439 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_BUG */
> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> -#define BUG() do {} while(0)
> +#define BUG() unreachable()
> #endif
>
> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON
You can only use 'unreachable()' in situations where it is truly
unreachable. In the case above you will reach it in the default case.
I would suggest one of the following instead:
#define BUG() BUILD_BUG_ON(1)
#define BUG() do {} while(1)
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists