[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912231715.11372.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:15:11 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression, 2.6.33-rc1->current git] NULL pointer in usb_serial_probe() introduced by the recent kfifo changes
On Wednesday 23 December 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:51:31AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Something like the patch below is necessary to fix a new NULL pointer deref
> > in usb_serial_probe() that appeared after the recent kfifo changes (in short,
> > the kfifo changes modified the semantics of kfifo_alloc() that
> > usb_serial_probe() reiled on).
>
> What semantic changed? I thought that the kfifo patches came with
> patches that also fixed up any changed that were needed. What went
> wrong here?
Previously write_fifo was allocated by kfifo_alloc() along with the structure
members. Now kfifo_alloc() expects to get a pointer to existing structure.
> Does your patch solve the oops?
Sure, that's why I posted it. :-)
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists