linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] prctl: return MCE process flags through pointer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091223193112.GN20539@basil.fritz.box>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:31:12 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"Smith, GeoffX" <geoffx.smith@...el.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Stone <michael@...top.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prctl: return MCE process flags through pointer

> Sorry, I wasn't aware of any published API, PR_MCE_KILL and KILL_GET just got accepted into mainline.  

An API is published as soon as the kernel including it is released.

> 
> I just noticed that these new options didn't follow the conventions of most prctl() options.  There is only one option newer than 2.3.48 that uses return-as-function-result, and that one is essentially a no-op.

We could have fixed it if you had mentioned that during code review before 2.6.32, but 
now it's too late (at least unless it would have been fundamentally broken or something like 
that, but I don't think that's the case)

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/