linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/6][RFC] sched: unify load_balance{,

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1261676596.9851.14.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:43:16 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	SureshSiddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"Pallipadi,Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/6][RFC] sched: unify load_balance{,_newidle}()

On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 13:55 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 11:16 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 11:09 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 10:29 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Is that with just this patch applied or also with the next one? I
> > > > worried more about the next one.
> > > 
> > > The next one is the troublemaker.
> > 
> > OK, let me re-read all that code with a fresh(er) mind.
> 
> Ok, so how does this work for you?

Yup, all better.  I'll take the full set for a spin, see if anything
else falls out.  (after belt-buster feast and recovery therefrom;)

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/