linux-kernel - Re: strange stuff in dmesg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2375c9f90912241831u57bb6fbfjd878876635cfea1a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Dec 2009 10:31:18 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	BuraphaLinux Server <buraphalinuxserver@...il.com>
Cc:	"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: strange stuff in dmesg

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:22 PM, BuraphaLinux Server
<buraphalinuxserver@...il.com> wrote:
> On 12/24/09, Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 12/24/09 02:03, BuraphaLinux Server wrote:
>>> On my Dell OptiPlex 330 machines with kernel 2.6.32.2 I get a strange
>>> WARNING.  Do I need to worry?  Here is the warning:
>>>
>>> [    0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [    0.000000] WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:1805
>>> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1b6/0x730()
>>> [    0.000000] Hardware name: OptiPlex 330
>>> [    0.000000] Modules linked in:
>>> [    0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.32.2 #1
>>> [    0.000000] Call Trace:
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff8108e806>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1b6/0x730
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff81043f68>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xd0
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff81043fcf>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x20
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff8108e806>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1b6/0x730
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff810b4e28>] alloc_pages_current+0x78/0xf0
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff8108da69>] __get_free_pages+0x9/0x50
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff810bb912>] __kmalloc+0x112/0x120
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff8146e773>] vgacon_scrollback_startup+0x13/0x70
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff811d29b3>] vgacon_startup+0x2a3/0x420
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff816fc556>] con_init+0x1b/0x230
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff816fba00>] console_init+0x22/0x42
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff816d4b8f>] start_kernel+0x240/0x3be
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff816d4289>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x99/0xb9
>>> [    0.000000]  [<ffffffff816d4389>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xe0/0xf2
>>> [    0.000000] ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
>>>
>>> I also got it on 2.6.31.9, but had waited to ask hoping 2.6.32.2 would fix
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Attached is my config
>>>
>> was there a kernel that did not do this?
>> if so can you try a bisect on this?
>>
>> Justin P. Mattock
>>
>
> It took a while, but I have verified that 2.6.30.10 works without any
> message, and 2.6.31 has the error message (but otherwise seems to run
> ok).  The hex codes are different, but the function names match and
> are in the same places.
>
> Does it have to be git bisect, or will trying the 2.6.31rc[1-9] be
> enough instead?  The Documentation/BUG-HUNTING does not give detailed
> enough instructions for me to do the bisect thing.

Hey, the problem is that you configured VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK_SIZE
to be CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK_SIZE=65536, which will be
65536Kb, i.e. 16384 pages, how huge! :)

We shoud limit the number of VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK_SIZE. I will cook
a patch now...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/