linux-kernel - Re: SCHED: Is task migration necessary in sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b9df5fa10912241853n58f4e9a4m579c57f55f957182@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:53:36 +0600
From:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SCHED: Is task migration necessary in sched_exec().

On 12/24/09, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 18:52 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
>
> Could have, but is very unlikely, and here we have one we know for sure.
>
Hmm... right. Thanks. Don't you think we need to check that very unlikely case?
Maybe it will help us to keep fair proportion with latency.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/