linux-kernel - Re: intel hda regression: 2.6.33-rc{1,2}: hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091225183205.744be270@mosly>
Date:	Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:32:05 +0200
From:	Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
Subject: Re: intel hda regression: 2.6.33-rc{1,2}: hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU 
 (according to top)

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:05:16 +0100
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:

> It's a bit surprising that this resulted in the high CPU usage
> instead of erroneous behavior.  This should be rather a bug of
> codec chip...
> 
> Anyway, Segei, which codec is on your machine?  Is it Analog Device
> one? 
> IIRC, the one's on Maciej and Eric machines are AD codecs.
> If so, we can just revert the changes to patch_analog.c in that
> commit.

How can I check? alsamixer shows 
    Chip: Analog Devices AD1981
Not sure it's valid though.

It's a HP Compaq 2510p laptop.

00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03)
        Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 30c9
(posted whole lspci output slightly earlier if needed)

-- 

  Sergei

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)