[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B361EAC.2090605@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:33:16 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Pieter Palmers <pieterp@...w.be>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Clemens Ladisch <cladisch@...tmail.net>,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] firewire: fix use of multiple AV/C devices, allow
multiple FCP listeners
Stefan Richter wrote:
> BTW, what about AV/C RESERVE? According to the spec, it means that a
> controller gets exclusive FCP access to a target. At this point, a
> node-wide FCP serializer will have to decide on a policy:
(because the spec does not have a concept of reservation IDs. It
stupidly takes node IDs for what should be reservation IDs even though
it distinguishes between the concepts of 'controller' and 'node'.)
> The simpler policy would be to remain oblivious of RESERVE. The more
> difficult to implement policy would be to keep track of reservations
> and only allow a single controller process (or user, or...) to perform
> subsequent transactions for the duration of a reservation.
Err, no, forget that. A reservation prevents only control commands, but
AFAIU not even all control commands because subunit specifications may
enumerate control commands that are still allowed during a reservation.
So the serializer would have to have knowledge of subunit specs. That
would quickly get out of hand.
> (I for one would keep it simple.)
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= ==-- ==-=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists