[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912271020.III12990.JSHOOQOMtFLFFV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:20:10 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: michael@...top.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Security: Implement disablenetwork semantics. (v4)
Michael Stone wrote:
> +int disablenetwork_security_socket_sendmsg(struct socket * sock,
> + struct msghdr * msg, int size)
> +{
> + if (sock->sk->sk_family != PF_UNIX &&
> + current->network &&
> + (msg->msg_name != NULL || msg->msg_namelen != 0))
> + return -EPERM;
> + return 0;
> +}
I think we should accept msg->msg_name != NULL || msg->msg_namelen != 0
if the socket is connection oriented protocols (e.g. TCP).
struct sockaddr_in addr = { ... };
int fd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
connect(fd, (struct sockadr *) &addr, sizeof(addr));
prctl( ... );
sendmsg(fd, (struct sockadr *) &addr, sizeof(addr));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists