[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1261950405.25298.30.camel@wall-e>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:46:45 +0100
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/6] kfifo: Make kfifo_in atomic
Am Sonntag, den 27.12.2009, 22:03 +0100 schrieb Andi Kleen:
> Right now kfifo_in allows copying in less than the input
> amount. This is unfortunately not a good idea on any
> record oriented users: if the size of the kfifo is not
> a multiple of the record (and that can easily happen due
> to the power-of-two requirement) then when the FIFO fills
> up partial records could be put in. Such a condition would
> be fatal for any record consumer who would get permanently
> desynchronized. In fact I doubt unless the input
> is a totally boundary less data stream I doubt anything
> could handle this.
>
> Change kfifo_in() to always put in everything or nothing.
>
> The return value is now always 0 or the full length.
>
That is why had written the macro version of kfifo. This provide an type
save kfifo implementation where struct records never will be splitted.
Have a look at the sample code in
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69093/
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> ---
> kernel/kfifo.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/kernel/kfifo.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/kfifo.c
> +++ linux/kernel/kfifo.c
> @@ -228,9 +228,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_in_n);
> * @from: the data to be added.
> * @len: the length of the data to be added.
> *
> - * This function copies at most @len bytes from the @from buffer into
> - * the FIFO depending on the free space, and returns the number of
> - * bytes copied.
> + * This function copies @len bytes from the @from buffer into
> + * the FIFO and returns 0 if there is not enough space.
> *
> * Note that with only one concurrent reader and one concurrent
> * writer, you don't need extra locking to use these functions.
> @@ -238,8 +237,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfifo_in_n);
> unsigned int kfifo_in(struct kfifo *fifo, const void *from,
> unsigned int len)
> {
> - len = min(kfifo_avail(fifo), len);
> -
> + if (kfifo_avail(fifo) < len)
> + return 0;
> __kfifo_in_data(fifo, from, len, 0);
> __kfifo_add_in(fifo, len);
> return len;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists