linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wl1251: timeout one too soon in wl1251_boot_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87pr60yg62.fsf@purkki.valot.fi>
Date:	Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:28:21 +0200
From:	Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@....fi>
To:	Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wl1251: timeout one too soon in wl1251_boot_run_firmware()

Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com> writes:

> `loop' reaches INIT_LOOP + 1 after the loop. so if ACX_INTR_INIT_COMPLETE
> occurs in the last iteration the write occurs but also the error out as if a
> timeout occurred. This is probably very unlikely to ever occur.

Thank you for fixing this.

> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@...ia.com>

I think John can take this. As Roel mentioned, this is nothing
critical and, if needed, can wait until 2.6.34.

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/