[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091227095720.GA14655@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:57:20 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: Lockdep spew with nouveau on 2.6.33-rc2
Hi,
Every time I boot my laptop (Fedora 12) I get the following complint from
lockdep:
[ 703.936365] =======================================================
[ 703.936369] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 703.936372] 2.6.33-rc2 #154
[ 703.936374] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 703.936376] X/1365 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 703.936379] (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff810f9672>] might_fault+0x72/0xd0
[ 703.936388]
[ 703.936389] but task is already holding lock:
[ 703.936397] (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa003202d>] nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf_call+0xfd/0x7d0 [nouveau]
[ 703.936412]
[ 703.936413] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 703.936413]
[ 703.936415]
[ 703.936416] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 703.936418]
[ 703.936418] -> #1 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 703.936423] [<ffffffff81081262>] check_prev_add+0x242/0x570
[ 703.936428] [<ffffffff81081be9>] validate_chain+0x659/0x750
[ 703.936432] [<ffffffff81081ff7>] __lock_acquire+0x317/0x4b0
[ 703.936436] [<ffffffff81082229>] lock_acquire+0x99/0x140
[ 703.936440] [<ffffffff8149c9c5>] __mutex_lock_common+0x65/0x4a0
[ 703.936445] [<ffffffff8149cede>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3e/0x50
[ 703.936448] [<ffffffff8130d67a>] drm_mmap+0x3a/0x70
[ 703.936453] [<ffffffffa0032d33>] nouveau_ttm_mmap+0x63/0xa0 [nouveau]
[ 703.936461] [<ffffffff81102954>] mmap_region+0x404/0x5a0
[ 703.936466] [<ffffffff81102e3c>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x34c/0x3a0
[ 703.936470] [<ffffffff810f496f>] sys_mmap_pgoff+0x1cf/0x2a0
[ 703.936474] [<ffffffff810079e9>] sys_mmap+0x29/0x30
[ 703.936479] [<ffffffff81002f6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 703.936483]
[ 703.936484] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
[ 703.936488] [<ffffffff8108155e>] check_prev_add+0x53e/0x570
[ 703.936492] [<ffffffff81081be9>] validate_chain+0x659/0x750
[ 703.936496] [<ffffffff81081ff7>] __lock_acquire+0x317/0x4b0
[ 703.936500] [<ffffffff81082229>] lock_acquire+0x99/0x140
[ 703.936503] [<ffffffff810f969f>] might_fault+0x9f/0xd0
[ 703.936507] [<ffffffffa0030ebe>] validate_list+0x1be/0x290 [nouveau]
[ 703.936515] [<ffffffffa003171f>] nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate+0xbf/0x150 [nouveau]
[ 703.936524] [<ffffffffa0032051>] nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf_call+0x121/0x7d0 [nouveau]
[ 703.936532] [<ffffffffa0032726>] nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf_call2+0x26/0x30 [nouveau]
[ 703.936541] [<ffffffff81306b25>] drm_ioctl+0x1c5/0x490
[ 703.936549] [<ffffffff811315c8>] vfs_ioctl+0x38/0xe0
[ 703.936553] [<ffffffff81131c65>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x75/0x370
[ 703.936557] [<ffffffff81131fe1>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
[ 703.936560] [<ffffffff81002f6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 703.936564]
[ 703.936565] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 703.936565]
[ 703.936568] 1 lock held by X/1365:
[ 703.936569] #0: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa003202d>] nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf_call+0xfd/0x7d0 [nouveau]
[ 703.936581]
[ 703.936581] stack backtrace:
[ 703.936584] Pid: 1365, comm: X Not tainted 2.6.33-rc2 #154
[ 703.936587] Call Trace:
[ 703.936591] [<ffffffff8107f8c9>] print_circular_bug+0xe9/0xf0
[ 703.936595] [<ffffffff8108155e>] check_prev_add+0x53e/0x570
[ 703.936599] [<ffffffff81081be9>] validate_chain+0x659/0x750
[ 703.936603] [<ffffffff81081ff7>] __lock_acquire+0x317/0x4b0
[ 703.936607] [<ffffffff81082229>] lock_acquire+0x99/0x140
[ 703.936610] [<ffffffff810f9672>] ? might_fault+0x72/0xd0
[ 703.936613] [<ffffffff810f969f>] might_fault+0x9f/0xd0
[ 703.936617] [<ffffffff810f9672>] ? might_fault+0x72/0xd0
[ 703.936624] [<ffffffffa001253f>] ? ttm_bo_validate+0x6f/0xf0 [ttm]
[ 703.936632] [<ffffffffa0030ebe>] validate_list+0x1be/0x290 [nouveau]
[ 703.936641] [<ffffffffa003171f>] nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate+0xbf/0x150 [nouveau]
[ 703.936650] [<ffffffffa0032051>] nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf_call+0x121/0x7d0 [nouveau]
[ 703.936653] [<ffffffff810f9672>] ? might_fault+0x72/0xd0
[ 703.936662] [<ffffffffa0032726>] nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf_call2+0x26/0x30 [nouveau]
[ 703.936666] [<ffffffff81306b25>] drm_ioctl+0x1c5/0x490
[ 703.936670] [<ffffffff81214dbd>] ? inode_has_perm+0x3d/0x70
[ 703.936679] [<ffffffffa0032700>] ? nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf_call2+0x0/0x30 [nouveau]
[ 703.936684] [<ffffffff81214f41>] ? file_has_perm+0xb1/0xc0
[ 703.936687] [<ffffffff811315c8>] vfs_ioctl+0x38/0xe0
[ 703.936690] [<ffffffff81131c65>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x75/0x370
[ 703.936693] [<ffffffff81131fe1>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
[ 703.936697] [<ffffffff81002f6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists