[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B380361.6010302@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:01:21 -0500
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Alacrityvm-devel] [GIT PULL] AlacrityVM guest drivers for 2.6.33
On 12/27/09 8:49 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/27/2009 03:39 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> No, where we are is at the point where we demonstrate that your original
>> statement that I did nothing to improve virtio was wrong.
>>
>>
>
> I stand by it. virtio + your patch does nothing without a ton more work
> (more or less equivalent to vhost-net).
>
Perhaps, but my work predates vhost-net by months and that has nothing
to do with what we are talking about anyway. Since you snipped your
original comment that started the thread, here it is again:
On 12/23/09 5:22 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > There was no attempt by Gregory to improve virtio-net.
It's not a gray area, nor open to interpretation. That statement was,
is, and will always be demonstrably false, so I'm sorry but you are
still wrong.
-Greg
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists