[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091228145619.GC4994@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:56:19 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [0/6] kfifo fixes/improvements
> > I guess the reimplementation came too late (happens sometimes)
> > And I agree that making kfifos record oriented makes sense.
>
> What does it mean? To late for 2.6.33 or to late to replace it for ever?
For 2.6.33 it's too late. Perhaps 2.6.34.
For 2.6.33 we just have to fix what's in. That is why I think
my patches are needed.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists