[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m37hs6rh46.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:14:17 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Crypto test results unused?
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> writes:
> is the core crypto code supposed to "kill" algorithms which fail the
> test?
>
> On little-endian IXP4xx 3 hardware-assisted algorithms fail (due to
> apparently unrelated bug which I will take care of). It seems the kernel
> is still using these failing algorithms (my debugging code adds extra
> fields to the /proc output):
>
> alg: skcipher: Test 1 failed on encryption for ecb(des)-ixp4xx
> 00000000: 01 23 45 67 89 ab cd e7
> alg: skcipher: Test 1 failed on encryption for ecb(des3_ede)-ixp4xx
> 00000000: 73 6f 6d 65 64 61 74 61
> alg: skcipher: Test 1 failed on encryption for ecb(aes)-ixp4xx
> 00000000: 00 11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 aa bb cc dd ee ff
>
> # grep 'ecb(des)-ixp4xx\|ecb(des3_ede)-ixp4xx\|ecb(aes)-ixp4xx' /proc/cryp
> to -A 6
> driver : ecb(aes)-ixp4xx
> module : ixp4xx_crypto
> priority : 300
> refcnt : 1
> flags : 0x85
> ptr : 0xbf020074
> selftest : unknown
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think probably crypto_alg_tested() should mark the failing algorithm
somehow?
void crypto_alg_tested(const char *name, int err)
{
...
found:
q->cra_flags |= CRYPTO_ALG_DEAD;
alg = test->adult;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe here? if (err) mark_as_failed(alg); <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
if (err || list_empty(&alg->cra_list))
goto complete;
alg->cra_flags |= CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED;
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists