[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091228204003.GH4994@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:40:03 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [0/6] kfifo fixes/improvements
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 09:04:13PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> The interface hasn't been changed, only the implementation. So it should
Ok I guess I was still thinking of your earlier version which
had a new interface.
> It is exactly the same behavior as the old kfifo API, so no user relies
> on the new "kfifo_in atomic" feature. The only user is you. And it is
That's not established. They might be just broken.
OK i checked and they all use power-of-two currently so by sheer
luck (I doubt it is by design) they work. Still I think that
open deathtrap should be fixed.
I also don't understand how that patch "breaks your future work"
Please elaborate on that.
-Andi
P.S.: I must say you make it really hard to use kfifos.
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists