linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [0/6] kfifo fixes/improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:40:03 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [0/6] kfifo fixes/improvements

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 09:04:13PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> The interface hasn't been changed, only the implementation. So it should

Ok I guess I was still thinking of your earlier version which
had a new interface.

> It is exactly the same behavior as the old kfifo API, so no user relies
> on the new "kfifo_in atomic" feature. The only user is you. And it is

That's not established. They might be just broken.

OK i checked and they all use power-of-two currently so by sheer
luck (I doubt it is by design) they work. Still I think that
open deathtrap should be fixed.

I also don't understand how that patch "breaks your future work"
Please elaborate on that.

-Andi

P.S.: I must say you make it really hard to use kfifos.

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/