[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091228205257.GA1862@ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:52:57 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
Cc: Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Iliyan Malchev <malchev@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...eaurora.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: tree with htc dream support
On Mon 2009-12-28 21:48:48, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > >> > Switch smd code to the version in staging. Something to apply to
> > >> > dream/ tree I'd say... and yes, it still works.
> > >>
> > >> I think we might want to consider leaving at least the core smd code
> > >> under mach-msm.
> > >
> > > In the long run, I agree.
> > >
> > > In the short run... the code is staging quality, so it should be in
> > > staging... and you'll not have to mainain so huge diff. (-20 kLoc).
> >
> > The core smd stuff is really not that large. The central smd.[ch] are
> > about 1300 lines, and proc_comm.[ch] are about 400 lines. Is it
> > possible to get some review/feedback as to what's "staging quality"
> > about this code so we can clean it up? I'd rather just fix the
> > issues
>
> Just submit it to Daniel W., ccing rmk and l-a-k, and I'm sure you'll
> get feedback.
>
> For a start, checkpatch has some mild complains.
BTW if would be cool to fix style in the staging/, then do git mv, so
that cleanups are clearly separated/changelogged in kernel proper...
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists