[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14362.1262035681@localhost>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:28:01 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Michael Stone <michael@...top.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, David Lang <david@...g.hm>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
"C. Scott Ananian" <cscott@...ott.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Bernie Innocenti <bernie@...ewiz.org>,
Mark Seaborn <mrs@...hic-beasts.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: disablenetwork facility. (v4)
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:55:11 +0100, Pavel Machek said:
> it is really only required for binaries setuid to someone else, but
> that would be too ugly. (Plus, as someone said, ping is great for
> leaking data out.)
Hmm... How is it "too ugly"? It's just a 'euid != uid' comparison? Or
am I missing some contortion required?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists