linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph distributed file system client for 2.6.33

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27445.1261959470@n20.hq.graphstream.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:17:50 -0800
From:	Craig Dunwoody <cdunwoody@...phstream.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	cdunwoody@...phstream.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph distributed file system client for 2.6.33 

sage weil writes (2009/12/21):
>If you want stability, then it's probably too early to merge.  If you
>want active users, that essentially hinges on stability too.  But if
>it's interest in/demand for an alternative distributed fs, then the
>sooner it's merged the better.

I understand there are many considerations about when to merge something
new, but in general would like to see the Ceph client merged sometime
soon.

In my view, there is a wide range of applications for which Ceph has
the potential to be significantly more efficient than the other
distributed file systems that I know about.

Ceph has a solid architecture and a small but strong dev team.  I
believe that the project is now at a point where wider-scale testing
can greatly accelerate progress toward production-level usability.
Having the client in mainline will help reduce barriers to such
testing.

Craig Dunwoody
GraphStream Incorporated

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/