[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091228075417.GB20039@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:54:17 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5]: trace_event: export HZ in timer's tracepoint
format
* Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Export HZ in timer's tracepoint, we can use it to get
> TIMER/ITIMER_VIRTUAL/ITIMER_PROF exact latency and it's
> suggested by Ingo
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/timer.h | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/timer.h b/include/trace/events/timer.h
> index 13ec15a..7749ae5 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/timer.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/timer.h
> @@ -74,14 +74,17 @@ TRACE_EVENT(timer_expire_entry,
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field( void *, timer )
> __field( unsigned long, now )
> + __field( int, hz )
> ),
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> __entry->timer = timer;
> __entry->now = jiffies;
> + __entry->hz = HZ;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("timer=%p now=%lu", __entry->timer, __entry->now)
> + TP_printk("timer=%p now=%lu HZ=%d", __entry->timer, __entry->now,
> + __entry->hz)
> );
I think we can do something slightly different and more efficient: just create
a new timer event to report the value of HZ.
That way we dont clutter the timer_expire_entry record format with a
repetitive HZ field. It's an extra 4 bytes overhead: that has to be written,
passed along, copied and thrown away in 99.9999% of the cases - such overhead
should be avoided.
If you created a special timer_params event, which would produce precisely one
event when triggered via say a new perf ioctl. I.e. add something like this to
perf_event.h:
#define PERF_EVENT_IOC_INJECT _IOW('$', 7, __u64)
and add code to kernel/perf_event.c's perf_ioctl() function that takes that
__u64 parameter as an event ID and injects an 'artificial' event.
Such a new feature would be useful for other things as well: backtesting rare
events, injecting other types of 'parameter/query events', etc.
There might be more details to this, but it would be a useful scheme IMO - and
it would still integrate nicely with the whole ftrace event enumeration scheme
so tooling support would be easier.
What do you think?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists