[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912291507490.2610@localhost>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:13:14 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: what's the purpose of MAXHOSTNAMELEN?
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote:
... snip ..
> > so lots of people define it but no one uses it. it *is*
> > exported to user space in /usr/include/asm/param.h, but i still
> > have no idea what it's for in user space. obsolete?
>
> According to RFC 1034, "Each node has a label, which is zero to 63
> octets in length"
>
> What is it used for in userspace, and why is it export from the
> kernel? Good question...
it's not clear what value that macro has in user space since (as
i've always understood it) the point of exporting a macro like that to
user space is so that user space apps can *agree* with kernel code
that employs the same macro.
but if absolutely *nothing* in the kernel uses that macro, then
there's nothing for user space to "agree" with. in other words, that
macro cannot *possibly* have any meaningful value in user space. does
that make sense?
my reaction at this point is to simply remove that macro definition
from include/asm-generic/param.h. anything in user space that's using
that macro is simply using a macro with a completely arbitrary value.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists