[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912292251.16427.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:51:16 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14899] reiserfs: inconsistent lock state
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:09:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14899
> > Subject : reiserfs: inconsistent lock state
> > Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
> > Date : 2009-12-11 22:06 (19 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126056920702515&w=4
> > Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67256/
> > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67257/
> >
> >
>
>
> I think this precise one is solved. The problem is that there are other
> vmalloc in the same path that also need to be fixed.
>
> I have a pending patch for that but as there are other reiserfs lockdep
> reports to be solved, I'm trying to pack all fixes in a same
> set so that they can be tested using a simple merge.
>
> For now, I guess this ticket shouldn't be closed until reporters
> can test the whole.
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists