[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1262176125.7135.207.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:28:45 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Liming Wang <liming.wang@...driver.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf_event: add check for group_list if the parent
isn't counted
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 19:28 +0800, Liming Wang wrote:
> If the parent has no entry in group_list, child_ctx will not be
> allocated, which will lead dereference of a NULL child_ctx.
That changelog sucks.
Best I can make of it is that there is a race where the parent gets his
context instantiated and we manage to get the mutex before the other
thread manages to add the first event.
Then we observe parent_event_ctx but have an empty list.
Is that it?
In that case, would it not be better to change the if (inherited_all)
condition to if (inherited_all && child_ctx) ?
> Signed-off-by: Liming Wang <liming.wang@...driver.com>
> ---
> kernel/perf_event.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 5b987b4..3664c4b 100644
> --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -5126,6 +5126,8 @@ int perf_event_init_task(struct task_struct *child)
> */
> mutex_lock(&parent_ctx->mutex);
>
> + if (list_empty(&parent_ctx->group_list))
> + goto exit;
> /*
> * We dont have to disable NMIs - we are only looking at
> * the list, not manipulating it:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists