[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0CE3DF69-C498-44BA-8CEA-C9AA5DB4CF84@niasdigital.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:08:34 +1100
From: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
To: me@...ipebalbi.com
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question of resource_size() implementation
On 30/12/2009, at 12:04 PM, Ben Nizette wrote:
>
>
> So resource_size would return SZ_4K and ioremap would map the SZ_4K bytes starting at MEM_AREA1_BASE, i.e. MEM_AREA1_BASE to MEM_AREA1_BASE - 1 /inclusive/. This is also correct.
>
IOW it's a matter of convention. Either we could define a single-byte range to be end=start and put the +1 in the resource_size or we could define a single-byte range to be end=start+1 and leave the +1 out of resource_size. The in-kernel convention is the former
> --Ben.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists