[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6828.1262190380@localhost>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:26:20 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: daw-news@...erner.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: disablenetwork facility. (v4)
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:24:11 GMT, David Wagner said:
> So while I certainly can't rule out the possibility that disablenetwork
> might introduce minor issues, I think there are fundamental reasons to
> be skeptical that disablenetwork will introduce serious new security
> problems.
I have to agree with David here - although there's many failure modes if
a security-relevant program wants to talk to the network, they're all already
prone to stuffage by an attacker.
Biggest danger is probably programs that rashly assume that 127.0.0.1 is
reachable. Seen a lot of *that* in my day (no, don't ask how I found out ;)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists