[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87hbr8w98c.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:30:11 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] vfs: get_sb_single() - do not pass options twice
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 13:36, OGAWA Hirofumi
> <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
>>> Filesystem code usually destroys the option buffer while
>>> parsing it. This leads to errors when the same buffer is
>>> passed twice. In case we fill a new superblock do not call
>>> remount.
>
>> This breaks the historical behavior. Several users of get_sb_single() is
>> parse data only on ->remount_fs. Well, ok, I like new behavior actually.
>> But we need to convert to new behavior such users.
>>
>> I've listed all possibly affected users up (if I'm not missing). This
>> means, using both data on ->fill_super and ->remount_fs is devtmpfs
>> only. And capifs, usbfs, devpts would be needed the patch.
>
> Hmm, these filesystem are probably not going to overwrite their own
> default options with their own special parameters to parse when they
> allocate their superblock. That would be pretty weird, wouldn't it?
> Seems they currently don't even pass "data" pointer around at that
> time.
Oops, I was missing that those all fs was using kern_mount(). Sorry for
noise.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists