[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912292110.42122.luke@dashjr.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:10:27 -0600
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@...hjr.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@....fi>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"Balbi Felipe \(Nokia-D\/Helsinki\)" <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP2: add USB platform data and initialization for Nokia N800 and N810
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 03:05:46 pm Luke-Jr wrote:
> The last-working N8x0 support (Linux-OMAP 2.6.30-rc8) required 1706 lines
> of platform data and initialization, split up into 6 files:
Upon trying to debug my non-working keyboard, I learned that the status of
mainlining is actually worse off than I thought, and my "last 2.6.30-rc8
working" revision was actually already missing platform data.
It seems logical from looking at the code needed to divide the board into at
least 5 files (line number estimates based on old code):
460 board-n8x0-common.c
175 board-n800.c (FM radio, touchscreen)
260 board-n810.c (keyboard, light sensor, LEDs, touchscreen)
600 board-n8x0-multimedia.c (camera, audio, DSP)
725 board-n8x0-storage.c (flash, MMC)
120 board-n8x0-lcd.c
On that topic, is there a reason the newer code is under a unified "N8x0"
config option instead of the split N800/N810 that was used for the old code,
or is that simply a symptom of the currently-supported features all being
common?
Luke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists