[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912302253.53285.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:53:53 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
> > Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> > Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4
>
> I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already
> known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was
> a trade off that was made to improve latencies.
OK, I've closed it as "documented".
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists