linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: record relocation offset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1262211776.2749.249.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date:	Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:22:56 -0600
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: record relocation offset

On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 19:58 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 06:39:36PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:45:30AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin escreveu:
> > > The kernel already knows where it is loaded -- obviously, by sheer
> > > necessity -- and knows how it was itself configured, and as such we
> > > can do this calculation in C code without modifying boot_params or
> > > the early bootstrap.
> > 
> > Problem is that at 'perf record' time we may not have access to the
> > vmlinux file, and thus not be able to figure out the relocation applied
> > in that boot.
> > 
> > Then, at a later time, and possibly on another machine, on another arch,
> > we try to map back IPs to symbols, the /proc/kallsyms is completely
> > unrelated and we now have a vmlinux unrelocated...
> > 
> > So we need a way to get the relocation applied at 'perf record' time and
> > encode it in the perf.data header. Ideas about how to do that?
> 
> Well, I guess we could do the _stext trick again, storing its value,
> taken from /proc/kallsyms, into the perf.data header, then figuring out
> the relocation by looking at its value in the vmlinux symtab.

So reading the thread, I think the problem only exists for x86 compiled
as a relocateable kernel.

> There were concerns in the past about relying on _stext, IIRC, James?

Well, the original concerns were that _text relative relocation
resolution only works for the core kernel, not for modules.
Additionally, the kernel is in several sections, most notably init and
runtime ... these may get loaded at different locations so _text
relative symbol resolution won't work in init sections.

Right at the moment, only x86 and ppc do a relocatable kernel, and, as I
understand the process, the whole kernel image gets a relative offset
applied, so all sections get the same offset.  Thus, for this case it
looks like computing the offset from any known symbol would work
(including _text).

James




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/