[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B3AC945.3090304@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:30:13 +0800
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] block: blk_rq_err_sectors cleanup
blk_rq_err_sectors() seems useless, get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/blkdev.h | 6 ------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 221cecd..fcbb9e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -843,7 +843,6 @@ static inline void blk_run_address_space(struct address_space *mapping)
* blk_rq_err_bytes() : bytes left till the next error boundary
* blk_rq_sectors() : sectors left in the entire request
* blk_rq_cur_sectors() : sectors left in the current segment
- * blk_rq_err_sectors() : sectors left till the next error boundary
*/
static inline sector_t blk_rq_pos(const struct request *rq)
{
@@ -872,11 +871,6 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_rq_cur_sectors(const struct request *rq)
return blk_rq_cur_bytes(rq) >> 9;
}
-static inline unsigned int blk_rq_err_sectors(const struct request *rq)
-{
- return blk_rq_err_bytes(rq) >> 9;
-}
-
/*
* Request issue related functions.
*/
--
1.5.4.rc3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists