| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091230091818.GW4489@kernel.dk> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:18:18 +0100 From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>, Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>, Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> Subject: Re: [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940 > Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> > Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4 I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was a trade off that was made to improve latencies. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists