lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <hhioif$j9t$3@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu>
Date:	Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:55:27 +0000 (UTC)
From:	daw@...berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3] Unprivileged: Disable raising of privileges

Alan Cox  wrote:
>Removing specific features from a specific piece of code
>generally isn't a security feature -

You lost me there.  The ability of a specific piece of code to voluntarily
relinquish privileges can be a big benefit to security.  It enables
privilege-separated software architectures, which are a powerful way to
reduce risk.  That's the motivation for the disablenetwork proposal that
has stimulated all this discussion.  I hope this is obvious?  Does it
need elaboration?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ