[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B3C1137.8060308@tmr.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:49:27 -0500
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Linux Kernel mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 32-bit, 32-bit PAE, 64-bit Kernel Benchmarks
Yuhong Bao wrote:
> Given that Linus was once talking about the performance penalties of PAE and HIGHMEM64G, perhaps you'd find these benchmarks done by Phoronix of interest:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_32_pae
>
I find these tests mirror my own experience with PAE, the benefit of having the
nx hardware enabled justifies the few percent drop in performance I was able to
find.
I find the huge gain in web service hard to believe without a hint why a 64 bit
CPU would be 15x faster. The disk, memory, and network wouldn't be faster, and
the CPU intensive tests weren't significantly faster, so unless the systems were
tuned differently where's the gain? Same feeling about the TP test, an order of
magnitude faster on a test running the same application on the same hardware is
hard to buy without an explanation.
The only obvious source I can think of is running the test load at 100Mbit on
one test and Gbit on another, because I saw an early network driver do just that
in negotiations with a switch.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists