[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:21:30 +0100
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: revert to show stack information in
/proc/{pid}/status
Am Freitag, den 01.01.2010, 23:05 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Stefani Seibold, le Fri 01 Jan 2010 16:10:16 +0100, a écrit :
> > But ps is not a performance critical application nor a cat
> > /proc/*/status!
>
> Errr, maybe not so much as some other operations, but a lot of tools use
> them, so it's really worth considering it.
>
Right. And i am still trying to find some optimization. Stay tuned.
Stefani
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists