[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100102210101.GN828@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:01:01 -0500
From: tytso@....edu
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: reiserfs broken in 2.6.32 was Re: [GIT PULL] reiserfs fixes
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:11:39PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> I've never lost any datas since I began this work. And
> I run it every day. If I had experienced lock inversions,
> and sometimes soft lockups, I did not experienced serious
> damages. It's a journalized filesystem that can fixup the things
> pretty well.
Have you tried using the xfsqa regression test suite? Despite the
name, it will work on non-xfs filesystems (although there are some
XFS-specific tests in the test suite.) Both the btrfs and ext4
developers use it to debug their file systems, and it's a good way of
stressing the file system in all sorts of different ways that might
not be seen during normal desktop usage. I suspect it would be a good
way of flushing out potential problems for reiserfs as well.
Regards,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists