[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1262420776.18097.3.camel@wall-e>
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:26:16 +0100
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: revert to show stack information in
/proc/{pid}/status
Am Samstag, den 02.01.2010, 14:53 +0900 schrieb KOSAKI Motohiro:
> 2010/1/2 Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>:
> > Am Freitag, den 01.01.2010, 23:05 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> >> Stefani Seibold, le Fri 01 Jan 2010 16:10:16 +0100, a écrit :
> >> > But ps is not a performance critical application nor a cat
> >> > /proc/*/status!
> >>
> >> Errr, maybe not so much as some other operations, but a lot of tools use
> >> them, so it's really worth considering it.
> >
> > Right. And i am still trying to find some optimization. Stay tuned.
>
> I can understand you feel sad. but don't worry. reverting is very usual event
> on kernel development. You can retry anytime if you make optimized code.
I had analyzed the problem and there is only one solution. Create a new
proc/<pid>/stack_usage entry, which was my first idea. This has absolut
now side effects.
I will write a patch and post it in the next days.
Stefani
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists