[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58607309.1e2f721f.4b3f57c0.807d3@o2.pl>
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:27:12 +0100
From: Bartłomiej Zimoń <uzi18@...pl>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [suspend/resume] Re: userspace notification from module
Dnia 2 stycznia 2010 15:04 Daniel Borkmann <danborkmann@...glemail.com> napisał(a):
> Hi Bartłomiej,
>
> Bartłomiej Zimoń wrote:
> > Dnia 2 stycznia 2010 13:36 Daniel Borkmann <llug.dan@...glemail.com> napisał(a):
> > I will explain more what i'm going to do.
> > The idea is simple. Kernel before suspend/resume sends notification to
> > registered kernel objects. So i have written small module to register
> > there and want now pass these data to /dev/file. It is 1byte so not a big deal.
> >
> > I'm searching now for notification about new byte in buffer, as it is almost
> > clear for async: http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/ch05.html#t4
> > but for sync still haven't find.
>
> This sounds very interesting... a "hack" could be the following:
>
> Register your pids to the kernel module, e.g. via ioctl, and if the
> (intra-kernel) notification will be delivered to your module you just
> send a signal to your registered processes via kill_proc_info(). Guess
> this is at least better than polling a file or sth similar.
>
> I guess netlink could be the "cleaner" solution, but with more overhead?!
>
This looks like more simple and could be good, after all i think about sending this
module here to add to kernel. So if this solution could be ok i will start to code this part.
Question is now what signal to choose to not terminate process and to be compatible
with rest of Linux kernel?
Best regards
Bartłomiej Zimoń
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists