[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100102144607.GA10094@bicker>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:46:07 +0200
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: drm: gem_object_free without struct_mutex
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:17:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [CC to Jesse.]
>
> On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > I've changed BUG_ON to WARN_ON in drm_gem.c (patch at bottom) to
> > get this dmesg when I resume after suspend, instead of crashing.
> >
> > Perhaps it's a patch that should go in, perhaps not, but obviously
> > the real problem lies elsewhere. Happens with 2.6.33-rc1 and -rc2.
> >
> > No surprise if I'm stupidly misconfigured to get the "pin power context"
> > error in the first place (.config on demand), but I don't deserve to BUG!
> >
The problem is dev_priv->mm.suspended which was set in i915_suspend().
In i915_resume()
107 i915_restore_state(dev);
The i915_restore_state() fails because i915_gem_object_bind_to_gtt()
does this:
if (dev_priv->mm.suspended)
return -EBUSY;
108
109 intel_opregion_init(dev, 1);
110
111 /* KMS EnterVT equivalent */
112 if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) {
113 mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
114 dev_priv->mm.suspended = 0;
We do set the dev_priv->mm.suspended here but it's too late.
Not sure the fix though...
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists