[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a1001020709m106b16fcqa15ee41a1a8e22a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 00:09:32 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, lockdep: annotate reclaim context to zone reclaim too
2010/1/2 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>:
> On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 22:29 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
>> When recursive annotation occur?
>
> Dunno, I told you you'd have to make sure it doesn't.
Please see PF_MEMALLOC turning on/off operation points. all
PF_MEMALLOC turing on point prevent recersive already.
(because, otherwise we lost PF_MEMALLOC and makes deadlock...)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists