[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001041121570.7191@router.home>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:22:48 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V8 07/16] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to
dynamically allocate counters
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 12/23/2009 12:57 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c 2009-12-18 13:13:24.000000000 -0600
> >>> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c 2009-12-18 14:15:57.000000000 -0600
> >>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >>> #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> >>> #include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
> >>> #include <linux/module.h>
> >>> +#include <asm/local.h>
> >>
> >> This doesn't belong to this patch, right? I stripped this part out,
> >> added Cc: to Rusty and applied 1, 2, 7 and 8 to percpu branch. I'll
> >> post the updated patch here. Thanks.
> >
> > If you strip this part out then ringbuffer.c will no longer compile
> > since it relies on the "#include <local.h>" that is removed by this patch
> > from the module.h file.
>
> Oh... alright. I'll add that comment and drop the offending chunk and
> recommit.
So we need a separate patch to deal with remval of the #include
<asm/local.h> from modules.h?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists