| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:46:13 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>, cl@...ux-foundation.org, "hugh.dickins" <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] Speculative pagefault -v3 On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:41 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 01/04/2010 01:24 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Patch series implementing speculative page faults for x86. > > Fun, but why do we need this? People were once again concerned with mmap_sem contention on threaded apps on large machines. Kame-san posted some patches, but I felt they weren't quite crazy enough ;-) > What improvements did you measure? I got it not to crash :-) Although I'd not be surprised if other people do manage, it needs more eyes. > I'll take a look over the patches to see whether they're > sane... More appreciated, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists