[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1262641573.6408.434.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:46:13 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
cl@...ux-foundation.org,
"hugh.dickins" <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] Speculative pagefault -v3
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:41 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 01/04/2010 01:24 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Patch series implementing speculative page faults for x86.
>
> Fun, but why do we need this?
People were once again concerned with mmap_sem contention on threaded
apps on large machines. Kame-san posted some patches, but I felt they
weren't quite crazy enough ;-)
> What improvements did you measure?
I got it not to crash :-) Although I'd not be surprised if other people
do manage, it needs more eyes.
> I'll take a look over the patches to see whether they're
> sane...
More appreciated, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists