linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [4/6] kfifo: add kfifo_out

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:24:29 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [4/6] kfifo: add kfifo_out_peek

> Macros are unpopular, for good reasons.  But the case for a
> template-based container such as this is a good one.  However I worry
> about the code bloat whcih the macro version might add.  We worry about
> all this later on.

Its really a special case for structs and fixed objects.

Bloat is going to be a big issue if its macro and all the serial/tty
stuff switches to it. Please keep the bytewise one none macro - even if
its a lib/foo.c file that simply uses the macros to produce the existing
new API.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/