[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B427547.5070109@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:09:59 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected
Hello,
On 01/05/2010 04:43 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> So it is unlikely but possible to deadlock by accessing a serio
>>> attribute of a serio device that is being removed.
>>
>> Hmm, I guess I was too quick dismissing lockdep complaints here. Now
>> that sysfs remove waits deadlock indeed is possible. Actually the locks
>> on serio->drv_mutex in attributes were added to make sure we don't
>> access device that was unbound from the driver through stale sysfs
>> attributes.
>
> Cool. So we have solved the problem generically but we have left over
> layer specific solutions. That seems like a good problem to have.
This is way too cool. Only if we can have more moments like this. :-)
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists