linux-kernel - Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3fx6l4ecc.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:53:07 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Thanasis <thanasis@...r.hopto.org>
Cc:	gentoo-user@...ts.gentoo.org, Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported

Thanasis <thanasis@...r.hopto.org> writes:

> I tried option: 2G/2G user/kernel split (for full 2G low memory), but X
> would not start. So i reverted back to CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G.

Binary proprietary module maybe?
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/