[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100103204230.a85ae137.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:42:30 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] libs: force lzma_wrapper to be retained
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:55:55 +0000 Phillip Lougher wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> >
> > When CONFIG_SQUASHFS=m and CONFIG_DECOMPRESS_LZMA=m, decompress_lzma
> > is built but then discarded from the library because no built-in code
> > uses it, so change it from a lib- to an obj- to force it to be kept
> > in the library.
> >
> > ERROR: "unlzma" [fs/squashfs/squashfs.ko] undefined!
> >
>
> Thanks for fixing this, I should have spotted it in my various
> config tests but didn't. I could add this to my squashfs-next patches
> to stop the linux-next tree breakage, however, should it go into
> Michal's kbuild -next tree instead?
You can/should go ahead and include this patch, I think.
> This patch raises a small additional issue, why is DECOMPRESS_LZMA
> (and DECOMPRESS_GZIP/DECOMPRESS_BZIP2) and defined as tristate?
> None of the above compressors can be built as modules.
No idea. Sounds like a potential problem.
> Regards
>
> Phillip
---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists