linux-kernel - Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:39:07 +0200
From:	Thanasis <thanasis@...r.hopto.org>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
CC:	gentoo-user@...ts.gentoo.org,
	Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@...ine.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported

on 01/04/2010 01:10 AM Krzysztof Halasa wrote the following:
> Thanasis <thanasis@...r.hopto.org> writes:
>
>   
>> Hmm..., but are EMBEDDED options suitable for a netbook like the A110L ?
>>     
> This "EMBEDDED" just means "don't touch these unless you really know
> what you're doing".
>
> BTW I remember using VMSPLIT 2 GB : 2 GB on server-class machines,
> before they were upgraded to x86-64.
>   
Do you mean that I should try it? Is there any gain over using
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/